far too much attention is paid to individual leaders, omitting their support bases, & structural forces - generally
but leadership clearly matters in the case of covid & forced closures
in SF, G, T, & NZ, risk-averse (female) leaders have triumphed.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-san-francisco-london-breed/609808/">https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...
but leadership clearly matters in the case of covid & forced closures
in SF, G, T, & NZ, risk-averse (female) leaders have triumphed.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-san-francisco-london-breed/609808/">https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...
i& #39;m not attributing country trajectories to individual leaders, or claiming those leaders were risk-averse bc they were female.
there are many other factors, clearly.
& the sample is small.
but i do think this signals the importance of diverse personalities in the executive.
there are many other factors, clearly.
& the sample is small.
but i do think this signals the importance of diverse personalities in the executive.
(hopefully @economeager isn& #39;t reading this thread, as i use covid to confirm my priors).