Read on Twitter
1/6 I& #39;m happy (and perhaps inappropriately proud of @w_mcauliffe) that this meta-analytic project on perspective-taking and empathy is finally out. It had some eye-opening conclusions that empathy researchers will want to deal with going forward. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868319887599?journalCode=psra&journalCode=psra">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1...
2/6 Since 1969, scientists have believed, along with the public, that we can raise our empathy for others& #39; suffering by trying to take their perspective (e.g., walk a mile in their shoes, imagine the shoe on the other foot--lots of shoes involved, really). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868319887599?journalCode=psra&journalCode=psra">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1...
3/6 Scientists also often use "remain objective" instructions to try & reduce empathy. A control group receiving no instructions at all is also important. Without it, we can& #39;t know whether PT instructions raise empathy, or remain obj instructions lower it. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868319887599?journalCode=psra&journalCode=psra">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1...
4/6 For this project, we retrieved every single experiment that tested whether perspective-taking instructions raise empathy & whether remain objective instructions lower it. 99.9% of the time, researchers measure empathy w/ self-report. How else, really? https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868319887599?journalCode=psra&journalCode=psra">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/1...
