#Reviewers

Kyle Siler

KyleSiler

This is an embarrassing justification by QSS editor-in-chief @LudoWaltman. Yes, as a general principle, diversity in perspectives is a virtue. That does not mean it's a good idea to publish

Michael Wohl

michaelJAwohl

Over the course of my career, I have been an Associate Editor at three journals. Finding reviewers was one of the most difficult parts of the job. Today is the

Daniel Roy

roydanroy

What's the "tradeoff" between interpretability & accuracy? Unfortunately, no one agrees on what's "interpretable". To move the needle an inch, @KDziugaite, Shai Ben-David, and I propose to model the *act*

Mbali Enhle 🌸

thee_academic

Academic Twitter: Do’s of getting your academic paper published: Summary. A thread. #AcademicTwitter 1. Make sure your paper is compatible with the journal you’re targeting & check if it is

hiugregg 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🥗

HiuGregg

Occasionally I'll see people asking about the "how" of book reviewing. How to actually organise your thoughts on a book, and how to handle that brain-to-keyboard conversion.I thought I'd make

Patrick McGee

PatrickMcGee_

*Thread*Overnight both @Apple and @EpicGames released hundreds of pages of new documents, containing lots of colour based on discovery and recent depositions. I stayed up reading so you don't have

Sam Parr ⚪️

theSamParr

Here's something: You know Michelin Stars? Like the things that tell you if a restaurant is fancy or not?Ever wonder why the tire company logo is on there? Here's why.

Olivia Guest (banshee/bantheyy) 🧟‍♀️ Ολίβια Γκεστ

o_guest

Something a lot of scientists seem not to (want to) realise is that we are writing papers to communicate with one or more sub-communities and if reviewers from those sub-communities

Katherine Apostolacus

Phenomenologiae

I’m coming to realize that the more I care about what my critics say, the worse my thinking becomes. It becomes imprecise and unguided, for any critic could sway me

Erasmus zu Ermgassen

erasmuszu

I love academia - the freedom to research things I find interesting - but one of the main reasons I think of leaving is this. The publishing system is broken,

Florian Jug

florianjug

Imagine you team up with great and successful scientists, write 100 pages of what you think makes an excellent EU grant proposal thats intended to directly help many fellow scientists

ulysses 👁

o_li_si

I think the Holy Mountain (1973) is a great film but the dude on letterboxd who left an article-long review with a half star rating has more valid points over

Meredith Young

meredithyoung1

Hanging out in a workshop on scholarly publication put on by @ElsevierConnect @TheLancet at @McGillMed by Rebecca Cooney (North American Executive Editor at The Lancet). Will try to summarize main

jeffrey ansloos

jeffreyansloos

I want to push back in my writing on reviewers demands of my social location. Of course our positionality informs our biases and distributions of power matter, especially when we

not the brian you work with

brianthehuman

every student on this intro studio midterm review had a 3 story building with skinny staircases as the *only* vertical circulation. no elevators even! which tells me that the instructors

trisha's study corner

trishastudiess

online study materials[thread] Yellow Pad PaperI am already in college and this is really a useful tool for me, because during online meeting and discussions. I take down notes using